公司在次粒碳资产中占有数亿：Al Gore

令他们沮丧的是，Al Gore和David Blood都观看了一些机构投资者，货币管理人员，公司和分析师对可持续性的影亚博赞助欧冠响兴趣。美国和高盛资产管理的前副总统和高盛资产管理的副首席执行官希望在仍然时间重新举行辩论。前往2007年，戈尔回忆，资产所有者和其他资本市场参与者越来越多地致力于想法，即长期投资者应该关心ESG事项 - 与环境，社会责任和公司治理有关。但全球经济崩溃的压力和不确定性留下了许多投资者和公司在立即关注的情况下解决。“我们来相信，在全球危机的后果中，势头已经放缓了，”戈尔告诉了亚博赞助欧冠。具有讽刺意味的是，戈尔和血液呼叫不健康的资本主义，包括投资者和公司管理层的短期行为，以及公司与业主之间的利益不对，有助于引发危机。因为资本市场和投资的可持续方法寻求避免此类灾害，但它的情况从未如此强大。上个月，作为努力提请注意问题，戈尔和血液发表了一份叫做“可持续资本主义”的白皮书，通过他们的公司发电投资管理。该对在2004年创立了伦敦一代，练习他们的传播。他们的根本集中的店铺旨在证明可持续投资不仅有效，而且可以是管理资金的高级方式。在其论文中，世代基金会将可持续资本主义定义为“旨在通过改革市场来解决最大程度的经济价值创造的框架，同时考虑所有成本和利益攸关方。”目前已关闭一代主要全球股权基金的投资者包括加州州教师退休系统和U.K.环境署的养老金计划。血液说，传统的投资管理行业不能承担调整可持续投资的所有责任。他认为支持者并没有一直在运送支持他们信息的经验证据。 “We have not been rigorous enough and clear enough about the business case for sustainability,” says the Generation senior partner. The white paper makes that case by pointing to a growing body of evidence. For example, it cites Maastricht University finance professor Rob Bauer and then–finance Ph.D. candidate Daniel Hann’s 2010 study “Corporate Environmental Management and Credit Risk,” which links proactive environmental practices and lower financing costs. The Generation Foundation’s report also quotes a 2011 Financial Analysts Journal paper titled “Pricing Climate Change Risk Appropriately” that explains why investors should address the cost of carbon on corporate balance sheets. Beyond this intellectual appeal, the foundation lays out five calls to action. They include integrating ESG issues into companies’ financial reports, aligning compensation with long-term performance and getting shareholders to invest for the long haul through securities that foster a buy-and-hold mind-set. In the latter case a company might offer a financial incentive for investors to hold shares for an agreed-upon period. “We acknowledge this is not complete,” Blood says of the document. “We hope we will inform the conversation around sustainable capitalism.” Orin Kramer, former chairman of the New Jersey Division of Investment, which oversees the state’s $69.6 billion pension plan, thinks Blood and Gore have hit the mark. “Fiduciaries will come to regard this as a seminal statement of the case for sustainable investing,” says Kramer, CEO of New York–based hedge fund Boston Provident Partners. “This will be an evolving dialogue, but these issues aren’t about some set of policy or ideological values; they’re about risk management,” he adds. “Frankly, their message and lines of argument should, in my view, be core elements of fiduciary training.” Kramer chairs the Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice & Human Rights, a nonprofit that promotes the discussion of sustainability among institutional investment fiduciaries. The Generation Foundation study calls for the identification of so-called stranded assets — those that would be unprofitable under scenarios such as enforcement of a fair price on carbon and water or higher labor standards in emerging economies — and their incorporation into financial reporting. Gore likens the cost of carbon emissions to subprime mortgages and the banking crisis. In 2007 banks and other asset owners held mispriced subprime mortgages on their books. Accurately pricing those securities wiped out value estimated in the trillions of dollars, bringing on the recent crisis. Today companies are holding “trillions of dollars in subprime carbon assets,” Gore says. When that risk gets fairly priced, they’ll feel the pain. As the former vice president points out, it’s already happening. Last November, Australia established a carbon tax; the next month Hong Kong–based utility CLP Group announced that it was writing down the value of its carbon-emitting assets in Australia, a move that lost the company almost $250 million. “Their Australian subsidiary held assets whose carbon assets were mispriced,” Gore notes of CLP. Robert Litterman, former head of firmwide risk for Goldman, Sachs & Co. and now a partner at New York quantitative hedge fund firm Kepos Capital, likes the report’s proposal about stranded assets. “If we priced carbon appropriately today, there are a lot of investments that would not make sense,” says Litterman, author of the FAJ climate change risk paper cited by the foundation. “Carbon will be priced much more quickly than people think, and investors should get ahead of that.” Talk of climate change can leave the impression that Generation is about so-called green investing. Gore, the firm’s chairman, is strongly identified with the green movement: His 2006 documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, helped take the climate change debate mainstream. Generation does have a private equity fund called Climate Solutions that it launched in 2007 to take advantage of emerging opportunities. But the vast majority of its assets are in the main global equity fund, which treats climate change as part of a much bigger picture. (Generation doesn’t disclose assets under management, but estimates put them at about $6 billion.) Long-term economic value creation lies at the heart of Generation’s sustainability thesis. The firm argues that pension plans, foundations, endowments and sovereign wealth funds are investors for the coming decades and into perpetuity — and should act accordingly because it’s in their best interest and a better way to make money. It goes back to the notion of fiduciary responsibility, or what Blood describes as “understanding the risks associated with and the ability to meet long-term liabilities.” Generation encourages long-term thinking, both among its investors and more widely. Five percent of profits go to the Generation Foundation, which was set up to promote sustainable capitalism. Generation’s fee structure eschews the typical yearly or quarterly schedule: In the global equity fund, fees are paid three years after the investment and then on a rolling three-year basis. Now, Generation is exhorting the financial community to change its time horizon. Perhaps the most radical of the paper’s five calls to action is for companies to stop automatically issuing quarterly earnings guidance. As Blood makes clear, this doesn’t mean companies wouldn’t produce quarterly reports or hold quarterly calls with shareholders. Instead, they would forgo an expected quarterly earnings bogie in favor of a time horizon that is appropriate for their business. Some CEOs, such as Paul Polman of Anglo-Dutch consumer goods conglomerate Unilever, no longer offer quarterly earnings guidance to analysts. But Blood admits that driving widespread change will be tough — partly because a swath of the investment industry, including many hedge funds and electronic trading houses, takes a short-term outlook. “Those that operate on short-term information are traders, not investors,” he says. Also, Wall Street makes much of its commission revenue from short-term trading.

戈尔仍然乐观。由于欧洲的债务困境和次级崩溃，“与不可持续形式的资本主义相关的问题是生动的展示，”他说。到2020年，戈尔预测，代代的长期方法将是主流的财务思维。声音远方？六年前，几乎没有人意识到全球经济站在灾难的边缘上。•