This content is from:Portfolio
Momentum Still Driving Investor Outflows from PIMCO
The initial rush from the bond house’s Total Return Fund has barely tapered off, perplexing analysts.
来自PIMCO总回报基金的投资者出局显示不得最快结束迹象。自突然开始以来已经六个月了departure of the firm’s co-founder Bill Gross自1987年5月开始以来,谁管理了该基金。到目前为止,人们会认为震荡效果会被淹没。显然它没有。
Following $78 billion in redemptions during the last four months of 2014, another $12.5 billion flew out the window in January, followed by $8.9 billion in February, bringing the total outflow over the past year to $119 billion, according to Morningstar. That no-confidence vote from investors has devastated the fund’s total holdings, which have fallen by nearly half, from $237 billion a year ago to $125 billion at the end of February. Analysts are perplexed. “There is no reasonable apparent logical reason for the continued outflows,” says Alina Lamy, a senior analyst at Morningstar in Chicago. “It’s surprising.”
On the surface, the reaction of investors seems out of proportion to the facts. Yes, performance was bad last year. The PIMCO fund returned 4.69 percent, well below the 5.21 percent average return of the Lipper U.S. core plus bond funds index. According to Lamy, however, the new managers of the PIMCO fund have steered it back on course and “have things under control.” Over the past six months, the fund has returned 2.27 percent, well above the 1.52 percent average of its Lipper class colleagues.
部分问题是,鉴于其在粗略下,投资者在总回报基金中的投资者对其传奇性表现,纽约的共同基金分析公司的豪华豪华州的豪华首领杰夫Tjornehoj表示,杰夫Tjornehoj表示。在过去十年中,PIMCO基金在89个资金利润者中排名第9位,分类为至少十年的核心加债券基金。PIMCO基金的十年平均年度返回率为6.19%,在2月28日结束的十年内平均达到5.02%,每年平均返回1.17%的返回。然而,只回望五年,揭示了一个非常不同的表现故事。Tjornehoj说,PIMCO基金在“包装中间”周围徘徊。5.06%的五年平均年度返回率低于潮湿阶级平均值5.12%。
为了解释投资者的行为仍然离开PIMCO基金,Lamy转向物理学。“此时,每月的流出是由投资者惯性驱动的,”她说。By that she means that the momentum of earlier redemptions continues to prompt new ones, as investor behavior mimics Galileo’s concept that an object in a state of motion possesses an inertia that causes it to remain in that state of motion unless an external force acts on it. In the case of PIMCO, Lamy believes that inertia is “propelling investors forward in the same direction, irrespective of performance, quality of management or the firm’s overall reputation.” The firm, co-founded in 1971 by Gross and since 1999 a subsidiary ofMunich–based insurer Allianz, remains a huge bond powerhouse with $1.65 trillion in assets under management.
The departure of Gross was an earthquake for PIMCO precisely because of his legendary past. “Bill Gross had built his reputation as the bond king,” says Tjornehoj. “Well, when the bond king is in trouble, people don’t have a whole lot of faith in the rest of the organization. It left PIMCO vulnerable as a firm to sudden departures of money.” Since Gross’ departure, the fund has been overseen bythree chief investment officers:斯科特玛瑟,美国的Cio核心策略;Mark Kiesel,Cio的全球学分;和Mihir Worah,Real Return和Multiagset产品组合的CIO。
PIMCO Total Return Fund investors were spooked not just by the fund’s loss of its founder but also because the managers who took over were new to the investing style of the fund, says Todd Rosenbluth, senior director of U.S. exchange-traded funds and mutual fund research at S&P Capital IQ in New York. PIMCO has sought to address this concern by assuring investors that the strategy of the fund has not wavered. “Whether there are inflows or outflows every day, we ensure that the strategy maintains the target exposures we have set for the portfolio in each fixed-income sector. Flows are not a reason to change the way we manage the strategy,” co-CIO Mather said in aQ&A PIMCO posted on its website。
To be sure, investors have not lost confidence in the broader class of U.S. core plus bond funds, according to eVestment, an investment data firm based in Marietta, Georgia. During the fourth quarter of 2014, $87.8 billion flowed out of the PIMCO Core Plus–Total Return Strategy, a category that includes the PIMCO Total Return Fund, as well as separate accounts managed with the same approach. If you remove PIMCO from the equation, all other funds classified as U.S. core plus received $27 billion in net inflows in the fourth quarter. The biggest beneficiary has been the $60.8 billion Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund, which has received $26.3 billion in net inflows since September, according to Morningstar. Investors have also rewarded the $31.4 billion双层线Total Return Bond Fund with $8 billion in net inflows since September. Gross’ new fund, the Janus Global Unconstrained Bond Fund, launched in May 2014, had attracted $1.4 billion in assets from October to January but saw $18.5 million in outflows in February, according to Morningstar.
很少有人准备好说,当流出势头将会下调,但最重要的一致它将取决于改进的基金表现如何赢得投资者的速度。“一旦当前的经理建立了足够长的赛道记录,那么出血将停止,”Rosenbluth说。
更多地获得更多固定收入。