This content is from:Portfolio

In China, Urbanization Is a Two-Way Street

At least part of the bump in Chinese consumer spending stems from discouraged workers returning to their smaller hometowns.

即使消费者没有停止支出,中国经济可能正在放缓。通常隐藏在政府统计中的内部移民趋势可能部分解释了难题。

The Chinese consumer seems oblivious to the broader state of the economy. Whereas gross domestic product growth in China has fallen from 7.9 percent two years ago to 6.9 percent in the past quarter, retail sales growth has held firm at about 11 percent. Although sales growth of big-ticket items such as cars has been relatively modest, spending on smaller items and services such as movie tickets and mobile phone subscriptions has increased at a breakneck pace (see chart 1).

有许多解释the consumer’s resilience. China’s government is actively promoting policies to shift its economy toward consumption. Income per capita is rising, and the middle class is growing, driven by urbanization, which typically involves the movement of populations from rural areas to coastal cities.

But urbanization is a two-way street. In fact, we at AB believe that some of the strength in Chinese spending can be explained by people moving back to smaller cities after trying their luck in the large tier-1 cities, such as Shanghai and Beijing, where migrant workers often discover that life isn’t easy.

Beyond the bright lights of the big city, housing is very expensive, so workers often live in rundown neighborhoods with long commutes to work. Some welcome government incentives to look for opportunities back in third- and fourth-tier cities, where lower wages are offset by a lower cost of living, so disposable income remains the same or improves. These trends often fall below the radar of official government statistics that nourish the markets.

For example, take the story of Lin, a 24-year-old from Mianyang, a tier-3 city of 4.5 million, in Sichuan province. Lin’s parents moved to Shanghai seekingbetter education, health care and income. Their higher incomes were reflected as part of a trend that further widened the urban-rural disposable income gap (see chart 2).

When Lin followed his parents to Shanghai, however, he found that work was a struggle. He told us that he lived in a poor area, left home at 4 a.m. to commute to work and didn’t return until 9 in the evening. And he didn’t really fit in culturally with his new Shanghai acquaintances.

在找到一份在线零售业务后,他回到了绵阳。它支付了25%,而不是在上海赚取的价格,但他的租金较低,他没有通勤费用。因此,尽管可支配收入下降,但林的酌情收入实际上增加了。近年来,下层城市急剧开发,现代化的运输基础设施,互联网连接和超额公寓库存,支持较低的租金。林说他在家里感觉得多,并没有真正放弃大城市生活的任何舒适。

Official data miss the nuance of Lin’s story — and of millions like him. Lin will be counted as having always lived in Mianyang, because hishukou, or household registration, hasn’t changed. It won’t reflect his move to Shanghai and back. Lin’s fall in income will appear as a slowdown in GDP growth, because his wages dropped when he left Shanghai. His rise in discretionary income — and better quality of life — won’t be visible at all to data analysts.

Of course, the economic slowdown in China is driven by many factors, primarily the sluggish industrial sector and weakening investments. To understand what’s really going on in China’s economy, though, you have to dig deeper. By looking beneath the surface, thedynamics of Chinese consumer spendingcan be revealed in ways that shed light on the government’s efforts to rebalance economic growth from the industrial sector toward the consumer.

Tassos Stassopoulos is portfolio manager of emerging consumer, global growth and thematic strategies atAllianceBernsteinin London.

SeeAB’s disclaimer.

Get more onemerging markets.

Related Content