Setting Standards for Transparency in Green Bonds

Until recently green bonds were the preserve of supranational organizations such as the European Investment Bank, the World Bank and the International Finance Corp. But corporategreen bond issuance has acceleratedover the past year, to roughly $12 billion of the $35 billion tracked by the London-based Climate Bonds Initiative. With green bonds’ rising prominence comes a need for a single set of clear and science-based criteria for what constitutes “green.” Nuclear power is low carbon, but some would balk at calling it green. And the coal industry would like investors to count fitting a coal-fired power plant with technology to reduce carbon emissions as a clean energy project, although fossil fuel consumption is hardly carbon neutral.

“When you get into the corporate space, you’re dealing with a large number of companies, and transparency is not always as good,” says Colin Purdie, head of global investment-grade credit at London-based asset management firm Aviva Investors.

None of this means Aviva wouldn’t invest in a bond because it doesn’t qualify as “green.” It just means the firm wouldn’t call it that. And therein lies the conundrum. A lot of these bonds would hit investors’ desks even without the green label. If the market is to grow into the large liquid powerhouse its proponents want, it needs a significant roster of corporate issuers to issue green bonds.

此外，此外还有第三方核查证明，发行人在环保项目上支出资金，债券旨在融资。这已经开始发生。根据“气候债券倡议”的数据，2014年发布的超过一半的绿色债券对其环境证书的独立第二次对其环境证书的意见，例如，在巴黎的奥斯陆和Vigeo的奥斯陆和Vigeo。

“当发布时发表的第三方核查时，我们需要更多的舒适度，”Purdie说。“如果他们称之为绿色债券，而且它是一种自我决定，他们制造了，我们不会把它视为绿色债券。我觉得我们会用少量盐来拿走这一点。“

绿色债券的超值已经变得普遍。许多企业发行都来自欧洲，这是今年的少数美国，包括美国银行的绿色产品，其中发布了5亿美元的绿色债券和两个real estate investment trusts: $250 million from Regency Centers and $450 million from Vornado Realty Trust. But market participants expect issuance by U.S. companies to increase.

“I think the biggest concern right now is trying to grow the market and getting more issuers to issue bonds,” says Catherine DiSalvo, investment officer at the加州州立教师退休系统. “We do support third-party verifications. The only problem is that it adds to the expense of issuing a green bond.”

One area that looks particularly promising in the U.S., as well as other parts of the world, is the state and municipal green bond market. U.S. issuers in 2014 included Massachusetts; Connecticut; Spokane, Washington; and the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority. Municipalities, especially, tend to have plenty of climate-related infrastructure projects on deck. By separating these from other financings and issuing the bond as green, they hope to bring in investors who may not otherwise buy their bonds.

“We think it’s a way of attracting investors who have mandates to invest in green infrastructure,” says Sarah Sanders, assistant treasurer of debt management for Connecticut’s Office of the State Treasurer. “I can’t quantify it, but whenever you have more orders for your bonds, it allows you to have better overall final pricing.”

In November Connecticut sold bonds that will provide $300 million for infrastructure, including a $60 million green bond for clean water projects. In the end, the state paid more for the green bond — 3.56 percent, compared with 3.06 percent for the plain-vanilla portion — due to a longer tenor. But it did attract nine SRI (socially responsible investment) investors who placed orders totaling $27.7 million, according to the state, and it plans to issue a $250 million green bond in April to fund additional clean water projects.

更多地获得更多固定收入.