此内容来自:

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING: POWER GRID




    DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING: POWER GRID
    现代信息系统应该模仿蚂蚁群,Songnian Zhou表示,昆虫和动物隐喻。

    By Marianne Sullivan
    January 2003
    亚博赞助欧冠机构投资者杂志


    The demise of a few ants doesn't prevent the colony from completing its task; similarly, a handful of disabled computers shouldn't deter a network from its mission. "If the ants die, you can just sweep them away," says Zhou, the 47-year-old chairman and chief technology officer of Toronto-based Platform Computing.

    与现代网络相比,很多年长的集中系统都像大象 - 巨大而强大,是的,但很难取代,他说。

    Zhou, who started using these kinds of analogies while earning his Ph.D. in computer science at the University of California, Berkeley, in the mid-1980s, co-founded Platform in 1992 to see if he could give them a practical application. His idea: that generic, networked computers should be easy to configure and, when they'd outlived their usefulness, easy to dispose of. But the point wasn't just to create a more reliable system; Zhou also wanted to offer a way to farm out the most complex number-crunching tasks to hundreds or even thousands of clustered computers acting in concert.

    Zhou's brand of distributed computing had immediate appeal among engineering-intensive industrial companies like Boeing Co. and Motorola, as well as government research labs and their academic collaborators working on joint projects. The concept later found a more popular use in Napster, which hooked millions of personal computers into a shared virtual music library.

    私人持有平台已经增长,利用技术 - 现在称为网格计算的技术 - 目的是从遗传研究到电影动画的目的。

    The financial industry has awakened to grid computing over the past two years. Platform's biggest client, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., has introduced it into risk management and derivatives-pricing applications, and other projects are on the drawing board, says Steven Neiman, the bank's vice pres- ident of high-performance computing.

    Vendors estimate that 20 percent of Wall Street firms have adopted the technology. Along with two other computing trends -- the open-standard Linux operating system and Web services -- grid computing offers timely solutions for technologists on tight budgets.

    Major financial firms typically maintain thousands of desktop and server computers that rarely operate at more than 20 percent of capacity. Grid computing harnesses and redistributes that unused power. To run, say, a complex multivariate financial model, grid software draws the necessary power from underutilized machines.

    Grids are "fungible pools of processing and storage [that can be] allocated on demand," explains Vern Brownell, a former Goldman, Sachs & Co. chief technology officer who is founder and CTO of Marlboro, Massachusettsbased software company EGenera.

    Corporations save money in two ways: They have less need to buy new hardware; and they can run more programs, since analyses that might have taken hours to run on a single computer can now be completed in minutes.

    "It is a way to combine cheap chips with great interconnectability and data mobility to get easy access to vast, cheap CPU [central processing unit] power," says J.P. Morgan's Neiman.

    The financial markets have spawned their own specialists in grid architecture and in a variant called server virtualization, which increases efficiency by turning a single computer into several "virtual machines."

    These suppliers include Brownell's EGenera, which provides trading technology to Credit Suisse First Boston; and DataSynapse, a New York outfit that has sold its system to Charlotte, North Carolinabased Wachovia Securities and to Abbey National in the U.K.

    Merrill Lynch & Co. is implementing server virtualization. Working with Palo Alto, Californiabased VMware, Merrill plans over the next two to three years to convert thousands of computers into what Merrill CTO John McKinley calls a "logical mainframe."

    Server virtualization differs from the ordinary grid approach, says McKinley, because it's not necessarily geared for computation-intensive operations and doesn't require reengineering of existing applications. However, the objective -- "maximum bang for the buck" -- is the same, adds McKinley. "In terms of software licensing, labor and hardware costs, we'll save millions of dollars a year."




    ©Copyright 2003 Institutional Investor, Inc.

    Write a letter to the editor