此内容来自:观点
餐馆正在被摧毁。金钱经理应该害怕。
小心较小的餐馆和资产经理之间的平行。
T.他纽约时报报道称,“大型链和资助的餐馆小组拥有资源,以乘坐长期关机,而是独立的餐馆,这些餐厅占美国用餐景观的三分之二 - 面条店,食客,以及总是迷人的城市餐厅门出门 - 可能无法生存。。。。75%的独立餐馆被关闭以保护美国人免受冠状病毒的保护不会成为它。“
T.he pandemic will have a similar effect on the asset management business. As could be expected, large, established managers will weather the storm. Many independently owned active managers, however, will be forced out of business — some because of poor performance, but others who generate good returns will also shut their doors because of cash-flow problems.
postpo分配器已经说他们ning fund decisions; the slurry in these managers’ sales pipelines is drying up. Despite having built solid businesses that put up good numbers, without new business and the associated revenues, they will have to cut their already lean staffs and, soon thereafter, close for business.
他们的损失也是我们的损失。
与2008 - 2009年不同,当市场崩溃的原因至少与行业有关时,今天这些企业家冒着一切冒险为客户创造更好的投资成果,他们的受益人没有自己的错误。这些是管理者 - 特别是新兴的经理 - 往往胜过他们更熟悉的同龄人and produce the alpha we so desperately seek.
We need to help these managers. I’m not suggesting a government bailout (although these managers should take advantage of such programs).
No. This is the time for forward-thinking allocators — especially those CIOs who have won all of the industry innovation and lifetime achievement awards — to realize that, asGideon Lichfield writesin theMIT Technology Review,我们不会恢复正常。现在是时候立即加强并投资这些经理 - 特别是新兴的管理人员 - 这是最不稳定的位置。
I’m not suggesting these allocators weaken their fiduciary standards and make imprudent investment decisions. Quite the opposite. As亚博赞助欧冠专栏作家克里斯托弗·斯切洛尔告诉我,我们不应该让良好的危机去浪费。正如Covid-19危机一样,揭示民间社会的缺点和新的可能性(例如,美国医疗保健系统和普遍基本收入),它揭示了我们目前的分配过程中的弱点和机遇。以下是我们可以为此过程提供三种变化,这将立即释放这些管理者:
- 打开分配窗口,专门用于新兴管理人员。甚至可能不会移动分配器的众所周知的众所周知的众所周知的分配对这些管理者的多个级别非常重要。
- Change your selection criteria. For example, be more flexible with the assets-under-management and track-record-length requirements. The crisis makes clear their arbitrary and punitive nature.
- Change your manager diligence process. Let’s begin by admitting that our kabuki dance with managers is generally ineffective (just ask Fund Evaluation Grouphow well this process worked in its selection of Malachite Capital Management) and potentially harmful.